A named person decides
Every delegation is granted by someone with the standing to grant it. An entitlement without an accountable approver is exactly what this model exists to eliminate.
Trust
A delegation model is only as good as the controls around granting one. These are the ones that matter, and the design principles we are building to.
Every delegation is granted by someone with the standing to grant it. An entitlement without an accountable approver is exactly what this model exists to eliminate.
The person who needs the authority does not approve their own access to it, and the model treats self-approval as a policy violation rather than a shortcut.
Authority is bounded at the point it is granted, not trimmed later. The resource, action and limits are stated up front.
Every delegation carries an end date. Indefinite authority is a deliberate exception that has to be justified, not the default.
Periodic review asks the accountable owner whether the authority is still needed. Silence is treated as a signal, not as consent.
Request, decision, activation, use, review and expiry each leave a record, so the question "why could they do that" is answerable later.
Stated directly, for reviewers who need it on the record.
We will share the design material and answer a security questionnaire in writing, including where the honest answer is "not yet".